[et_pb_dcsbcm_divi_breadcrumbs_module separator=”sep-mdash” admin_label=”Global Divi Breadcrumbs” _builder_version=”4.14.8″ _module_preset=”5dda5b90-a7f2-4717-bb89-5c9eed43c33a” global_module=”46633″ saved_tabs=”all” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}” title_font_size_tablet=”48px” title_font_size_phone=”44px” title_font_size_last_edited=”on|desktop” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][/et_pb_dcsbcm_divi_breadcrumbs_module]
Criminal Penalty Case Summary
In Anton v Anton 38 Fla. L. Weekly D230, the District Court of Appeal found the trial court erred in holding a husband in indirect criminal contempt where the court did not issue a show cause order, and neither notice of hearing on the wife’s contempt motion nor motion she filed placed husband on notice that he potentially faced criminal penalties at the contempt hearing.